Election photo IDs would certainly restrict the voting of people attempting to vote multiple times, vote in place of others, or vote without US citizenship. If there are indeed voters out there who lack any govt-issued photo identification, forcing them to either get such ID or blocking them from voting seems to me a very acceptable price to pay for increasing the integrity of the voter ranks.

Conversely, enabling legitimate voters who refuse to get govt ID cards at the cost of enabling illegitimate voters represents too high of a price in my assessment, thus I vigorously support photo IDs as one of several obviously (to me) necessary voter reformations.

Additionally, the firing of those attorneys because they didn’t file charges against Democrats, and the pressure placed on them to do so in the first place is unethical, and probably illegal.

Challenging voters with questions about ids doesn’t increase voter participation. It restricts it. Especially when there are many elderly people who don’t have ids especially.

Democrats and Republicans both accuse each other of dirty election tricks; shouldn’t the claims of each side be investigated? I would certainly like investigations into the claims that repos circulate false info about voting sites in black areas. But how can we investigate that without also investigating republican claims that in democratic voting districts people are voting for each other and for dead people?

Speaking of which, I cannot imagine a maximally efficient voting system without people proving who they are via photo ID as one of several obvious steps.